Mr. Perrine's article, "The Nature in Proof of the Interpretation of Poetry" left me rather eager to start learning about poetry. I have always been turned off by the fact that poetry leaves the readers with a rather gray matter. Interpretations could mean one thing, or polar difference. I am the kind of person who looks at things as either black or white and gray is not in my vocabulary. However, after reading this article, I was comforted by the fact that he feels there IS a right and a wrong interpretation of a poetic piece. However, this does come with the challenge of finding that right interpretation of the piece- the exact thing I struggle with.
Upon reading a poem, I develop my own interpretation of it in my head. Once I do so, I have a difficult time accepting anything other than the one I developed. For example, when I read the poem by Emily Dickinson, my interpretation was the exact expample he used as being false. Upon reading his interpretation, I saw how it could work, but I felt my interpretation was no better than his. However, being the enthuased learner I am, I am going to follow Perrine's advice this quarter, and accept other's interpretations and seek the CORRECT one, and not just one formulated in this little brain of mine.
but don't ignore what Perrine says about multiple meanings/interpretations being possible, so long as the details support them.
ReplyDelete