Thursday, December 16, 2010

How I met your mother

Plot

In regards to plot, “How I met my husband” would be similar to the film adaptation. Instead of Chris Waters flying into the city on a plane to give rides, I would have him as a temp who is working on the road in front of the house where Edie is living. She would pass him working on the road when she took the kids to school everyday for months, and then one day Chris would come up to the door and ask her if he could get some water because they ran out that day. They would lock eyes and have a “moment”. Everyone else in the community would pick up on their odd romance, for he would be a very attractive man everyone wants to talk to. The film would be similar in the fact that there would be an annoying neighbor who thinks she knows everything and always interferes. Once the man goes onto a new job, he tells Edie he will write her, and she checks the mail everyday. Like the short story, she will end up marrying the mailman.


Point of View

The Point of View would be first person. The first scene would be Edie talking to her kids as they lay in bed and she is telling them stories of how she and their father met and got married. The story will be told with all of Edie’s personality. Because of this, the viewers will get mixed feelings. What is happening on the screen (Edie and Chris falling in love) will not match the narration. For, Edie will be very apprehensive about her relationship with him and talk about how it was very innocent and she didn’t know what to expect. More emphasis will be placed on the mailman when there is a montage of her going to the mailbox everyday and not getting a letter. They will start to talk and eventually hit it off. While on screen this may be a minor scene, the narration will convey passion and love.


Characterization

The second scene of the film would be Edie at her real home and what it was like for her to grow up. She will not have a washer and dryer or dishwasher or any amenity she has at the Peebles’. This will convey her innocence and naivety. Throughout the scenes in the film, Edie will be seen encountering things like a mixer, a washing machine, and a toaster for the first time. She will not know what to do with them, and she will be fascinated. This conveys how she loves new things and experiencing new adventures. Because of these details, it will not be a surprise when she jumps onto Chris. Chris on the other hand will be this dashing man who is suave and stylish and always knows the right word to say at any given moment.


Setting

Whereas the text occurred in a small town, so too will the film. It will be in a small farm town in Bargersville, IN. The neighborhood will be an affluent one, but with a farm feeling. Whereas the text had neighbors right next door, the nearest neighbors will be our of walking distance. This fact will make it more ironic how the neighbors think the know everything about everyone. The city will be large enough to have character, but small enough for rumors to travel quickly. The road being fixed is to help allow for a huge country club that is going in down the street. This shows that it is a growing city that is fairly sizable.


Theme

Whereas the theme of the text was Edie being older and wiser now, and looking back on her mistakes and wishing she would have chosen differently. The film adaption will lead the viewers to believe that the theme is “everything happens for a reason”. In the opening scene, she will be laying in bed with her son, who is upset about his girlfriend that broke up with him. She will start the story with the intention of telling him not to worry about it. She will show him that it is important to live life without regretting things. In what she thought was going to be a small anecdote to convey her message to her son, she ends up telling him how the two of his parents met, and how they would not change their life for the world. In the end, the son will learn to be okay with their separation and pursue the girl he never thought he would be with but found they have quite a connection.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Shawshank the Movie

PLOT
In regards to plot, the movie and the book were almost exactly paralleled. Most of the time when novels are made into movies, the film makers are forced to cut out key elements to the novel. Because Shawshank was just a novella, the film makers were able to keep all information from the novella when making the film. However, there were a few subtle differences between the film and the novella. For example, the head screw in the book did not get arrested once Andy escaped. Another difference was that Worden Norton did not kill himself when the guards were trying break into his office. In the novella, he simply resigned from his position and went on about his life. My mom's favorite part, when Andy turns on the music for the entire campus to hear, was not included in the novella.

POINT OF VIEW
When talking about point of view, the two were not all that different. In the novella, Red did most of the talking and told the stories from his point of view. He often interjected into the stories that some of his stories were just hearsay, but he did get them from reliable sources. While the movie was handled the same way, Red did not interject his opinion into each matter. It was more dialogue between he and Andy than him narrating, although there was quite a bit of both. Andy never really talked in the novella, but he did talk sometimes in the film version. I personally liked how Red did gave his opinion to most of the subjects, for it gave a personal touch to the story line.

CHARACTERIZATION
The first thing I noticed when watching the film version last night with by bestie Keaton McCoy was how violent the guards were when interacting with the prisoners. It caught me by surprise actually. In the text version, the "screws" kept them in line but never really physically abused him. This was the complete opposite in the film. Matter of fact, it made my heart hurt when I watched how they treated them. In addition, Red made the "screws" in the novella out like they were the scums who were dirty and didn't really care about life. The way in which the "screws" dressed made them portrayed as more sophisticated.

SETTING
When I pictured the prison Red portrayed in the novella, I pictured somewhat of a rundown shack that they lived in. I never imagined the castle-like prison that was used in the movie. I felt the prison used in the movie lacked the "hard" look that the one in the book had. However, once Andy escaped from his cell, the images of him escaping were exactly what I expected. The human waste exploding from the pipes and Andy climbing through them was almost more than I could handle. Once Andy has completely escaped from the jail, the image of him tearing off his clothes, was amazing and made me cry. The vivid images of the movie brought the entire morale of the story home to me.

THEME
When talking about theme, the novella and the movie were very similar. Everyone knew that Andy did not belong in prison. Even when he was there, he acted as if he wasn't even incarcerated at Shawshank. Everyone held Andy to a higher regard than the other prisoners, even the screws did. The warden made it his prerogative to make certain Andy didn't get the best of him. However, the warden let him do just that. Some people just don't belong behind bars, and the same is true with life. Some people are meant to be free spirits and just can't be held captive. This was Andy, he took his time in Shawshank to formulate his plan, and in a sense make his life better because of it.

Thursday, December 2, 2010

The downfall of our society

I am a firm belivever of the coherence of the family. I believe that familes with a father and mother are more effective and will ultimately lead a more fulfulling life. When I read this story, my first reaction was this poor child. From the beginning, he is torn between who wants him because the two people that made him no longer want to be together in raising him. I feel like I could see him in ten years when he does not have a father and is living his life on the edge and his mother has no control of him. It makes me sad. I think our society can learn from this short story by learning to make better decisions about who we will marry and who to have children with. After all, no one is imagining their relationship will end that way when the deed is done.

The Drunkard

All I have to say is the little boy's mother respones way differently than my mother would have if I had come home drunk. First of all, I feel it was very disrespectful for him to do it. I am not fully convinced that he did it to be the brake for his father's drinking. I fell that he may have just wanted to see what it tasted and felt like to be able to act like his father. If I were his father, I would not have allowed him to act like that in the street. Yes, he may have been drunk, but he did not drink so much alcohol that he was trashed beyond his mind. He was just putting on a show in order to get attention and to make everyone else look at him. In fact, he may have been doing this so that his father could have seen what he looks like when he comes home drunk all the time. I am not sure what is true, for this is just one odd story!

Zoe is wierd

The whole story is an example of situational irony. Throughout the entire story, Zoe talks about how she is always getting in trouble for saying her jokes in her class at the university. However, she is also making a living off of her book about humor. Zoe felt that her expertise of humor would stay strictly to her business life and stay out of her life in the personal sense. However, she is proved wrong when Earl thinks she is downright odd when she starts cracking her jokes at the end of the story. Zoe is just wierd and a social misfit. Why would anyone in their right mind want to move to the midwest in a little town by Terre Haute. First of all, the only thing that happens there is extensive drug use. This means that Zoe isn't really that good of a history teacher and instead just settles for teaching US history in a small town at the local college.

Lottery of Death

The point of view of this story was crucial to the overall meaning of the work. Having a third person omnipotent view allows the reader to make his own decisions about the process as a whole. It also allows the reader to realize the tone of the lottery as well. Up until the end of the story, the reader has no idea what the lottery is actually conducted for. If the nararrator would have hinted at this throughout the story, then the reader would not have the surprise element at the end of the story. The POV shows that the community really does not care about what happens in the society. The fact that the little children were throwing stones at their mother adds an element of surprise that would not be revealed with a limited nararrator. The story would not be what it is without that element.